In the partnership Dieckman, the applicant challenged the acquisition of Regency Energy Partners LP („Regency”) by a subsidiary of the shareholder in a single $11 billion unit merger. Regency`s partnership agreement expressly eliminated all trust obligations and other spotial obligations with respect to conflict transactions approved either by unrelated shareholders or by a conflict committee (composed of two or more directors who were not simultaneously members of the board of directors of the co-sponsor or one of its related companies). The merger of the reign was approved by the unrelated owners (with the agreement of 69% of the total unrelated units representing 99% of the unrelated units present at the meeting), and it was also approved by the Conflict Committee. A partnership agreement should clearly indicate the extent to which the program`s obligations and shareholder rights are changed under the contract. Among the provisions that would be most protective for an complemist are the provisions relating to partnership agreements. In Dieckman/Regency (March 29, 2016), the Court of Chancery again confirmed that contractual agreements in a simple limited partnership agreement would define the respective rights and obligations of the partners, including the body`s trust obligations (and the resulting advertising obligation) in related transactions. The decision continues the general approach of delaware courts to provide the highest level of protection against the challenges sponsors face in transactions between a Master Limited partnership and its compatton, or associate members of the corporation, as long as there is increased importance in the current environment of attention to the partnership agreement provisions for related transactions. Historically, the provisions for corporate master companies in commercial partnerships have rarely been significant with respect to related transactions, mainly due to the occasional decline in assets by a co-sponsor of the company. However, given the current difficult market conditions affecting the oil and gas industry`s MLPs, transactions between MLPs and their related companies have become more frequent (and are likely to become more frequent).