The principles of breach of confidentiality arise from Megarry J.`s statement in the case of Coco v AN Clarke (Engineers) Ltd  RPC 41. The three elements are: in other words, it removed the word „term” and simply renamed the exchange of information „due diligence period,” which shows that, after the first exchange, the confidentiality obligation is still in force and that the treaty is still fully in force. Advantage: The use of an express clause in a contract allows the parties to extend the protection of cheap confidentiality principles, adapt them to each case and waive the need to go to court to define the obligations of the parties. The unveiling party may also wish for guarantees as to the confidentiality it can expect from the receiving party. With the survival clause, you can essentially accept that a contractual clause maintains its legally binding status and applicability even after the contract expires. Here is an example of a contract with a survival clause! In principle, the limitation of liability clause does not apply to termination of the contract, unless it is expressly considered by the parties. Regardless of the termination or expiry of this contract, the provisions of the [—–] clauses in favour of the parties are maintained. If the parties expressly provided for certain clauses for a specified period of time, it may be suggested that, in the past, the parties no longer intend to terminate those provisions. This may seem like a lot of survival clause options, but many are achievable and in some cases it is not necessarily important what format you choose. Limited jurisprudence is to determine the period during which a duty of confidentiality between commercial enterprises may apply and has not established easily identifiable rules.
Much seems to depend on the circumstances of disclosure, the economic value and the nature of the information.