Many in the Philippines, particularly in defence and foreign policy institutions, want the VFA to be prosecuted. On February 6, 2020, Foreign Minister Teodoro Locsin Jr. reportedly said at a Philippine Senate hearing that the continuation of the agreement was „more beneficial” to the Philippines than to end it. Some supporters are trying to avoid President Duterte`s actions. On February 10, the Philippine Senate passed a resolution asking the president to reconsider his intention to repeal the agreement, and on March 2, he passed a resolution asking the Supreme Court to rule on whether the Senate should approve the dissolution of the treaty, which the political statement said is unclear. The presidential palace has announced that it will consider a Supreme Court decision on the matter. As a contract for the execution of the VFA, EDCA authorizes the prepositioning of war materials on approved sites. This includes strengthening the modernization capabilities of the Philippine armed forces. READ: The pH of the military pact with the UNITED States) But in Duterte`s announcement, there is a glimmer of hope: according to the agreement, the official cancellation of the VfA will not take effect for 180 days, meaning that Washington and Manila have until August 9 to save them or negotiate a new VFA to avoid a new alliance crisis. The challenge is that Duterte is an extreme anti-US. President, who could try to eliminate the MDT as a whole in favor of greater autonomy and better relations with China and Russia.
But success speaks volumes about the permanence of the alliance, despite the whims of an autocratic president. The VFA must clarify the conditions under which foreign military personnel can operate. In general, a VFA deals primarily with legal issues relating to military individuals and property. This may include issues such as entry and departure, tax obligations, postal services or the conditions of employment of nationals of the host country, but the most controversial issues are the civil and criminal competences of visiting staff. In civil matters, the VFA provides for the identification and payment of civilian damage caused by the armed forces. Criminal issues vary, but the typical provision in the VFA is that U.S. military courts have jurisdiction over crimes committed either by a serving member against another serving member or by a serving member as part of his or her military duty, but the host country retains jurisdiction for other crimes. A3: Both countries signed the VFA in 1998.
It offers simplified access procedures in the Philippines for U.S. service providers on official stores (for example. B U.S.-Philippines bilateral training or military exercises), and it provides a number of procedures to solve problems that may be present due to the U.S. military in the Philippines. Military cooperation between the United States and the Philippines continued under Duterte, despite his skepticism of bilateral relations. Joint activities and U.S. assistance include external defence, counter-terrorism, humanitarian assistance and disaster relief. U.S.
and Philippine forces participated in some 281 joint activities in 2019. In May 2019, the Philippine Navy participated in the first joint navigation across the South China Sea with the United States, Japan and India. The two sides are continuing preparations for balikatan 2020, the largest regular joint exercise between the United States and the Philippines, scheduled for May, involving nearly 11,000 U.S., Filipino and Australian troops.